Use your newly create blog to post your journal entry about The Sabertooth Curriculum and the first design principle we created in class. Complete this entry by Sunday at 5 pm. Remember the three questions that guide professional reflection.
- What did I learn?
- What does it mean and what supports that position?
- What are the ways in which it might impact my practice?
The most important thing that I learned from Sabertooth is found in a quote on page
25. “He knew how to do things his community needed to have done, and he had the
energy and will to go ahead and do them. By virtue of these characteristics he
was an educated man.” I think this quote speaks volumes about our education
system. Are we really preparing kids for the world and helping their community?
How do we know what the community needs? These are the questions that as
educators we need to try to answer. The problem with trying to prepare kids for
their community is that we as educators do not get to make decisions about what
we teach curriculum-wise to prepare the kids for the world. The curriculum is
passed down to us from the powers that be and it is our job to impart that to
the kids. In my opinion, this is not always the best thing we should be
teaching the kids- the things that would most help them in their search to be a
meaningful member of their community. I think that the open dialogue that
Peddiwell uses about preparing the students for their community is echoed all
throughout Sabertooth. The stories
about the Paleolithic society are filled with what the community needs, and as
the lectures go further on, we see them moving farther and farther away from
the needs of the community and more towards what they feel are the historical
conventions are to uphold (fish grabbing, tiger scaring, and horse clubbing).
We see the community upholding these traditional subjects even though the
community no longer needs to be taught these things. This begs the question of
our own community and its teachings: what exactly are we teaching that has been
rendered superfluous by time? How can we better adapt to what we need in our
communities currently? This is a question we all must face as educators and
also will try to answer through the Design Principals and Processes we are
making and discussing in class. Actually, if the members of the Paleolithic
community had the PICKLE thought process- perhaps their community would have made
a better more ideal curriculum for their particular community needs.
All
of this reflection being said, there were several parts of Sabertooth that I found to be really interesting and that I made an
instant connection with. I am a big reader and there was a particular passage
on page 42 of Sabertooth that really
reminded me of Harry Potter. Peddiwell
is talking about how the community leaders started to think about the fact that
the students in their Paleolthic community only needed the THEORY of these
skills (fish grabbing, pony clubbing, and tiger scaring) without having to
actually practice the skills. Everything would become the theory of the skill-
not the actual doing of these long practiced skills. This particular part
reminded me of Harry Potter and the Order
of the Phoenix when Professor Umbridge is the Defense Against the Dark Arts
school subject teacher. She is a terrible character and one of the most hated
in the entire Harry Potter series. She comes in to Hogwarts School of
Witchcraft and Wizardry and revolutionizes the way the subject is being taught.
She- like in Sabertooth- decides that
the knowledge of the skills of defending themselves against evil is enough to
pass their Ordinary Wizarding Level (OWL) tests. She goes on to say that they
do not need to use magic; they need to only know the facts. This connection
really reminded me of the way the SOLs are in Virginia and that we have cut
down so much on the doing of things in education. Like for instance, at my
school we used to do a Colonial Day where the fourth grade did a whole project
and the grade would get together for weeks to practice skits, music and songs,
and dances. They would even put on a small play. But, as soon as the SOLs
became more and more intense- that was the first thing to go out of the
curriculum. Even though many students said that it was their favorite part of
the year. This is something we need to look into, no more than the teachers in Harry Potter- are we doing the very best
we possibly can? Or is it that we are trying to teach to the test and not doing
any actual practicing of those needed skills? This truly is food for thought
and something we as educators need to be aware of.
As
far as impacting the ways that I would practice education is that I would try
to bring back more of the practicing of skills into the classroom. I know that
for me, as a librarian this kids need to learn how to use the online library
catalog. Just this past week, I taught them how to use it, but instead of
droning on and on about it, I decided to have the kids do a library scavenger
hunt to practice the skills rather than just knowing the theory of finding the
books in the library. This, to me, is much more effective because it makes the
kids use the knowledge they have to answer the questions. Instead of just the
theory of the library catalog they need to go out and use it to find specific
answers to the questions. As soon as I told the kids they were going to
practice it with the scavenger hunt they were super excited to go out and DO
it. I think that if you give kids activities- things like QR codes, or
scavenger hunts, or web quests, especially when you integrate technology they
are learning that much more. Their excitement level also goes up so much
because it is interacting with the skill, not just hearing about it.
OK - you had me at Harry Potter :) I love this connection and you are so right about how the teaching at Hogwarts went downhill as the factions became more contentious - so much so that the students themselves took up responsibility for their own learning with the Order of the Phoenix! I don't think our students have that luxury so I agree that it is up to us to work to provide it for them.
ReplyDeleteOn another topic, I was struck by your thought "what exactly are we teaching that has been rendered superfluous by time?" It's hard to know what has lost its relevance as a curricular objective in real time - I think it's only clear in hindsight. BUT, can we use the design process to limit the irrelevance? As you did this week by changing up the way you taught the catalog, we can provide a framework for learning, even state a specific goal, but by letting students follow their own path to learning, we make it more likely that they will be able to use elements of that path in other situations!
I agree that students should have the opportunity to be doers as opposed to having things done to/for them. This follows the methodology of STEM and Discovery learning. This week, I had my students research their names using three websites I linked with QR codes. 2 of the websites were reputable and 1 was not. I did not mention any of this to them when I gave them the codes. They thought nothing of it as they attacked the sites searching for their names. They quickly realized that the third website had very little information and was really just a front to lure you in via keyword searches in order to get you to purchase a product. By having them discover the difference themselves, they are more engaged and have a deeper understanding of evaluating online sources than if I had presented a lecture on verifying the validity of internet sites in isolation.
ReplyDeleteHey Laura! I hope you don't mind my asking but, I LOVE your idea to teach website evaluation. Would you be willing to share just the names of the sites you used? I would really appreciate it!
DeleteJhaggert@live.gmu.edu
Of course! I will email it right now.
ReplyDelete