Write a journal
entry and post it to your blog by 5 pm on Sunday about The
Victorian Internet and the second design principle created in class.
Remember the three questions that guide professional reflection.
• What did I learn? What does it mean and what supports that position? What are the ways in which it might impact my practice?
This week, our assignments
for class featured the book, The
Victorian Internet by Tom Standage. This book was extremely different from Sabertooth, the book from the previous week.
This book went into great detail talking about the history and design of the
first telegraph. I personally thought it was a riveting read, because I had
never known that so much went into making the first telegraph. Until reading
this book, I had never once heard of an optical telegraph, nor did I give much
thought to the specifics of this particular technological feat. The fact that
the inventors somehow had to come up with a way to get a telegraph line under
water all the way from England to America still baffles me. I am getting ahead
of myself here, but it truly was astounding- talk about design!
As far as answering the
first question of what I learned, I can proudly state that I learned a lot from
this particular book. I really enjoyed the fact that it broke down the process
of designing the telegraph and the many ways in which it was a failed design,
and then ultimately the designs that were put into use around the world. I feel
that in history, we are often taught the glossed over version of events. Like
for instance, I never thought about the fact that there would be people so
short sighted when it came to technology. On page 20, it says: “since the war
with France had ended, the telegraph system was in no need of improvement.
Telegraphs of any kind are now wholly unnecessary … no other than the one in
use will be adopted.” This is the kind of thing that we are not often taught in
school. Things like people arguing about the best method, the best model, the
fastest cheapest way of doing whatever it is they are trying to accomplish. We
almost never learn about the backlash the idea gets when it is first received.
If you were lucky and had a good teacher in school, you may have learned about
Morse code and how that innovation in design changed telegraph forever. But
mostly, you stick to the fact that he invented it and that was that. As we
learned though from The Victorian
Internet this is a gigantic understatement in terms of the events leading
up to Morse developing the telegraph. As I briefly mentioned before, there was
an optical telegraph that had a system of flaps and different things that
allowed the viewer to communicate from a fair distance away. Of course there
were terrible limitations to this including weather, time of day, and distance.
But, this would be something you were totally unaware of because once again, in
history we have a tendency to gloss over the way that you got to the desired outcome- the actual invention at
its best. You never hear about two inventors who were so preoccupied in
fighting over who was doing more work that they almost came to an actual fight.
You never hear about people falling in love over the telegraph wire or how
there were marriages performed across state lines by telegraph. Learning about
the process of the creation of the telegraph was very interesting because it
was basically a comprehensive guide to the whole design process. From the first
models to the actual workings of the telegraph and the impacts on the world, it
was an interesting way to see the “highway of thought” at its beginnings.
There are also a lot of
similarities between the telegraph and the modern Internet we have today. They
both drastically improved the pace of the world and the way we share
information, they also both started off as being for the government. It also
changed the way jobs were used. For instance, some jobs (like the pony express)
were no longer needed. But, we saw a rise in skilled workers to be able to use
Morse code, same thing for the Internet- we no longer needed typists to type a
paper for you, now we needed computer programmers or other jobs similar to
that. The use of code and encryptions is still relevant today but it started
with the telegraph. These are only several of many similarities, but I was
shocked at just how many there were!
As we talked about in
class, good learning design reflects the thoughtful considerations of the
technologies chosen and considers the cognitive, social, societal, and physical
consequences. This statement is true both of designs from the telegraph days to
our current Internet. These considerations are also similar between both the telegraph
and Internet today because they are good designs. Such as, there was now a way
to verify information in a fast reliable way, which was cognitively sound. As
far as social we see a whole crop of people in The Victorian Internet that are able to communicate with each other
that was not at all possible before hand. (This was also similar to the video
we watched about the printing press bringing people together- even if it was
only through their ideas). The Internet did the same thing, it made the world
smaller and people in each society were more able to understand what was going
on in different places throughout the world in a much broader sense than
before. Physically things also changed drastically with telegraph and Internet.
Before both of these technologies, people were able to write letters but the
mail was unreliable, slow, and news was so outdated that by the time it got to
you from a different country literally wars could be over and no one would have
any idea. Physical limitations were now something totally overcome. Information
could be delivered at an astounding rate, and this of course presented new
consequences. These consequences were things like how to keep up with the
traffic of the telegraph messages, how to make the telegraph wires able to be
submerged into the Atlantic ocean, and there were even things like wars being
fought and criminals being caught with the use and help of technology. The
Internet has even less physical limitations today. We have different
consequences, but as far as physical limitations, you literally cannot even go
in your own personal car these days without having Wi-Fi as an optional
upgrade.
All of this being said, I
think the way all of these things would effect my own teaching practices is
that we need to be aware of the consequences of technology. It really can be a
can of worms at times. Technology is wonderful but it does create problems that
can be unforeseen. This is why you need to think about the consequences before
jumping in. Such as, in my library we often use something called Playaways.
These are audiobooks the older students in fourth and fifth grades can check
out. There is one book title per audiobook and the kids absolutely love using
this technology to listen to a book. They are also super helpful for kids who
struggle with comprehension, because they can read and listen and that seems to
really increase their ability to take in all the details and maximize their
comprehension. This all being said, there are consequences for this new
technology. Cognitively some of the students only listen with half an ear and
are not really using them the same way they would a book. They lose interest
faster and are more likely to not read the entire book listening than
physically reading it. Socially, there are less Payaways than there are
students so they need to be willing to share, which can sometimes be a
drawback. As far as our society of students, we have third graders who
continually ask me to change my mind and let them get the Playawys like the
older kids. And physically, there needed to be space made in the library for
these things to be stored so the kids can use them. So, the benefits much
outweigh the drawbacks, but you need to have a good design plan for
implementation before you use technology in the classroom or library setting.


I found your discussion of how the teaching of history glosses over all of the steps forward and back and then forward again that a technology's invention took before it reaches the final finished state that we remember/know it as to be interesting. Perhaps it is this lack of familiarity with the process of design that makes us as a society so unlikely to think through the consequences of our actions because we have this feeling that things just magically appear without any real thought, effort, failure or reexamination. Maybe if we want to create individuals who are better at mindful thinking, then we should show them frequently as children how even the simplest, most taken for granted technologies that they use went through processes similar to that of the telegraph. Then it would become part of their core knowledge that any good design takes time, trial and error and ability to foresee problems before they arise.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteNice summary of our work last week. I think you hit on something, i.e., we need to be cognizant of whenever we make a plan – the influence of human nature. You mentioned how we don’t always get the full backstory about a new technology – just the facts about who, what, and when. In particular, your example about the arrested development of the telegraph following war’s end (“since the war with France had ended, the telegraph system was in no need of improvement. Telegraphs of any kind are now wholly unnecessary …”) makes me think about how a society acts during a post-war or post-national trauma era. As when the Saber Tooth Curriculum was written, nations enter into a period of fatigue, perhaps even isolation, and lack the will to prepare for another time of upheaval. Rather, we talk in terms of “the war to end all wars” or “a lasting peace” without hedging our bets (not that I always expect a crisis but human nature being what it is, we don’t have a great track record). And when we invent, design, or plan, maybe we need to take the Shark Tank approach – be clear-eyed about potential problems and the realities of the road ahead while remaining confident in our product because, as you say, “the benefits much outweigh the drawbacks.”
ReplyDeleteOne other observation that your post provoked: you wrote “The Internet did the same thing, it made the world smaller” when talking about the effect of the telegraph (and the internet). I can’t help but feel that this is another example of one problem solved and another created through unintended consequences for good or bad. The world is both a smaller place where people who might never have “met” are now in contact BUT this brings with it new opportunities for isolation (the stereotype of the geek nerd sitting in a dark basement staring at screens – sometimes sharing with others but just as often merely observing). It’s hard to look so far down the road when new technologies (new learning strategies) are introduced – preparing students for new situations (new temptations?) with new technologies that don’t even exist yet! My brain hurts.