While reading copyright clarity, there were several things
that I learned. To sum it all up, copyright makes good designers because for using
copyright well, you have to consider the whole project. The intent for
copyright is to spread knowledge, even within the first amendment guidelines, does
not extinguish creativity. I also noticed that collaboration is so important
with the idea of copyright, even among educators. Copyright and fair use is not
trying to squelch what educators do; it is trying to protect creators and
consumers from doing anything wrong.
I also really liked
certain cases the book presented. The Harry Potter example from the book was
very interesting to me, not just because it was about Harry Potter but the idea
that you cannot just make an anthology of someone’s work and use tons of quotes
and other things in there, that is against fair use. I really was happy that
the man in that case was in violation of copyright because when I was reading
the background information, I thought that surely there would be no way they
would let him! So, I was happy with that ruling. Another thing I found
interesting was when they talked about those infamous charts about copyright,
which you see, in secondary education all the time! This is apparently wrong. I
have seen TONS of those things, which basically terrify you and list all of the
things that will land you in jail for copyright infringement. It is also supremely
unhelpful because it does not tell you what you CAN do, at all. It is pretty funny to hear Hobbs say that this
is not correct, because I remember thinking to my self when I viewed those
charts that it would be slim what you COULD do. I also liked that she told us
several things that are misconceptions, like you can never copy anything to
give to someone else (false), or that fair use is only applied to educators
(false), or that there is no such thing as copyright bias from companies
(false) and that they will not try to scare you into purchasing things you
could use for free under fair use.
The ways that copyright would impact my practice are
several. I think that for my purposes, I actually teach my students about
copyright and fair use (in the most basic sense), including things like
citations from when you borrow information from someone else. It’s hard for the
kids to understand that they cannot just borrow whatever information they want
and that’s why we also talk about plagiarism a bit as well. So, for me, this
book really helped me for that use- it made me realize how to better go about
talking to the kids about copyright. I also think that personally, it clarified
a lot of things about copyright for me. There are still some things that I
think I am unsure of about copyright. I feel that it is one of those topics
that is hard to fully understand, and that is something that I personally need
to work on.
I agree with you that this is a hard topic to wrap your head around. If we have this kind of difficulty, how can we expect our students to get it right without our support. So, we have to model appropriate behavior with copyright and fair use, dispel as many misconceptions as we can about the charts and licensing guidelines we read about (every time the subject comes up), and push our students toward transformative use of information. Keeps everyone out of jail AND helps students think critically and creatively.
ReplyDeleteYes, modeling the appropriate way to cite sources and think through whether fair use applies is what we need to do for our students. I think this is another example of teaching students to think critically about what information they are encountering--don't just accept what is written as the truth without verifying it for yourself.
ReplyDelete